<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debate Forum 3/8/11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daytoncitypaper.com/debate-forum-3811-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daytoncitypaper.com/debate-forum-3811-3/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=debate-forum-3811-3</link>
	<description>Miami Valley&#039;s Arts, Culture &#38; News Weekly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:51:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Garrity</title>
		<link>http://www.daytoncitypaper.com/debate-forum-3811-3/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Garrity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daytoncitypaper.com/?p=4078#comment-846</guid>
		<description>I am firmly in continued support of public broadcasting, for both forms on TV and radio.

I think it has long been a goal of some on the right, to somehow do away with public broadcasting.

I am sure their dislike of public broadcasting comes in part from their overall dislike of government---at least government that operates in a &quot;liberal fashion&quot; and that they do think that the news and other programming has a &quot;liberal bias.&quot;

Like in other issues going on out there now like gutting most of the collective bargaining rights of public employees, the right is taking advantage of the &quot;budget crisis&quot; to do try to rationalize their going after all of the things they don&#039;t like.

I disagree with the idea that since we have so many options today when it comes to programming on radio and television----we no longer need public broadcasting.

Even though there is programming, especially on television networks that at first blush, seem to be like the programming offered by PBS, I think a closer look at comparing the programming on say The History Channel and PBS is actually very different.

I doubt that a History or Discovery Channel would provide the time for a long spread out series like those produced by Ken Burns or would provide airtime for programs like &quot;Independent Lens.&quot;

When it comes to the programming of music on television--I doubt that GAC or CMT would air a program like &quot;Austin City Limits.&quot;  Back when Gaylord still owned and called that channel &quot;TNN&quot;--you used to see some programs that highlighted higher quality country music and even some artists that are more adequately considered to be under the genre of &quot;Americana.&quot;

Other than PBS, with &quot;Austin City Limits&quot;--there is no representation of this genre of music, which is growing larger.

You once would see networks like A&amp;E feature shows that highlighted jazz and classical music in its early days--but no longer. BRAVO once had a somewhat &quot;highbrow&quot; type of programming-but not today----BRAVO now has degenerated to only airing the lowest of the low of what I call &quot;Least Common Denominator&quot; sorts of programing with shows like their various versions of the &quot;Real Housewives of ________&quot; shows.

I think that the programming on PBS very much has its place in our cultural landscape and it would leave a gaping hole in that landscape should the proposed defunding of the CPB is successful and that somehow leads to the end of PBS.

I do think that even if the funding did dry up---PBS and NPR would both somehow continue and those of us in places like SW Ohio would still have our stations--but it would likely lead to those less well funded stations in more rural places would not be able to survive and that would be a sad thing for those who live in such areas who won&#039;t or cannot afford to pay for cable or satellite TV and also cannot afford to get Sirius/XM sat radio--will be left living in cultural wasteland.

I have called both Sherrod Brown and Mike Turner&#039;s offices, urging them to vote against any attempts to defund public broadcasting. I didn&#039;t bother with Rob Portman. I don&#039;t know his position on this--but I suspect he is all for gutting public broadcasting and it doesn&#039;t matter to him that any of his constituents are not in favor of such a move. I may just go ahead and either email or call his office to let him know my feelings anyway--for whatever good it may do.

I would urge anyone who reads this to consider doing the same if you haven&#039;t done so thus far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am firmly in continued support of public broadcasting, for both forms on TV and radio.</p>
<p>I think it has long been a goal of some on the right, to somehow do away with public broadcasting.</p>
<p>I am sure their dislike of public broadcasting comes in part from their overall dislike of government&#8212;at least government that operates in a &#8220;liberal fashion&#8221; and that they do think that the news and other programming has a &#8220;liberal bias.&#8221;</p>
<p>Like in other issues going on out there now like gutting most of the collective bargaining rights of public employees, the right is taking advantage of the &#8220;budget crisis&#8221; to do try to rationalize their going after all of the things they don&#8217;t like.</p>
<p>I disagree with the idea that since we have so many options today when it comes to programming on radio and television&#8212;-we no longer need public broadcasting.</p>
<p>Even though there is programming, especially on television networks that at first blush, seem to be like the programming offered by PBS, I think a closer look at comparing the programming on say The History Channel and PBS is actually very different.</p>
<p>I doubt that a History or Discovery Channel would provide the time for a long spread out series like those produced by Ken Burns or would provide airtime for programs like &#8220;Independent Lens.&#8221;</p>
<p>When it comes to the programming of music on television&#8211;I doubt that GAC or CMT would air a program like &#8220;Austin City Limits.&#8221;  Back when Gaylord still owned and called that channel &#8220;TNN&#8221;&#8211;you used to see some programs that highlighted higher quality country music and even some artists that are more adequately considered to be under the genre of &#8220;Americana.&#8221;</p>
<p>Other than PBS, with &#8220;Austin City Limits&#8221;&#8211;there is no representation of this genre of music, which is growing larger.</p>
<p>You once would see networks like A&amp;E feature shows that highlighted jazz and classical music in its early days&#8211;but no longer. BRAVO once had a somewhat &#8220;highbrow&#8221; type of programming-but not today&#8212;-BRAVO now has degenerated to only airing the lowest of the low of what I call &#8220;Least Common Denominator&#8221; sorts of programing with shows like their various versions of the &#8220;Real Housewives of ________&#8221; shows.</p>
<p>I think that the programming on PBS very much has its place in our cultural landscape and it would leave a gaping hole in that landscape should the proposed defunding of the CPB is successful and that somehow leads to the end of PBS.</p>
<p>I do think that even if the funding did dry up&#8212;PBS and NPR would both somehow continue and those of us in places like SW Ohio would still have our stations&#8211;but it would likely lead to those less well funded stations in more rural places would not be able to survive and that would be a sad thing for those who live in such areas who won&#8217;t or cannot afford to pay for cable or satellite TV and also cannot afford to get Sirius/XM sat radio&#8211;will be left living in cultural wasteland.</p>
<p>I have called both Sherrod Brown and Mike Turner&#8217;s offices, urging them to vote against any attempts to defund public broadcasting. I didn&#8217;t bother with Rob Portman. I don&#8217;t know his position on this&#8211;but I suspect he is all for gutting public broadcasting and it doesn&#8217;t matter to him that any of his constituents are not in favor of such a move. I may just go ahead and either email or call his office to let him know my feelings anyway&#8211;for whatever good it may do.</p>
<p>I would urge anyone who reads this to consider doing the same if you haven&#8217;t done so thus far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
